Legal Opinion

Higgins v. H.P. Hood, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 24, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Tina M. Higgins, the employee, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Sto-vall, HO) determining that she suffers 3% permanent impairment as a result of a 2001 work injury to her right arm, incurred while she was employed by H.P. Hood, Inc. The hearing officer relied on the opinion of an independent medical examiner to find that Higgins’s permanent impairment is 3%. Higgins does not contend that pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 312(7) (2006) there is clear and convincing evidence to contradict the medical findings of the independent medical examiner (IME).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lydon v. Sprinkler ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Dubois v. Madison Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sprague v. Lucas Tree ExpertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API