Lydon v. Sprinkler Services
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.
Dissent: CLIFFORD and LEVY, JJ.
SAUFLEY, C.J.
[¶ 1] We are called upon to determine whether a physician may be appointed to serve as an independent medical examiner in a workers’ compensation proceeding, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 312 (2001), if that physician has performed examinations of other employees at the request of an employer, insurer, or employee, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (2001 & Supp. 2003). In the matter before us, a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (.McCurry, HO), denied Joseph Ly-don’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Beaulieu v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Laskey v. SD Warren CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Weeks v. Allen & Coles Moving SystemsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bridgeman v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Alec T. Sabina v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Baker v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Kirk v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.