Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentHardiman, Circuit Judge
joined by SMITH and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
At the outset of its analysis of James Dennis’s Brady claims, the Majority notes that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) “dictates” our review. Majority Op. 280. The opinion describes with precision AEDPA’s strictures. Federal courts are prohibited from granting habeas corpus relief unless the state-court adjudication (1) “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” or (2) “resulted in a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.