In Re Stanford
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM.*
| Jhis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondents, Daniel James Stanford and John Kevin Stockstill, attorneys licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
The formal charges arise from a 2005 case in which respondents, who shared office space at the time, were co-counsel for a criminal defendant charged in Lafayette Parish with two counts of aggravated rape.1 If convicted of this charge, the defendant faced a mandatory sentence of life in prison. The defendant was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ZiankovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- In Re StanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- People v. FaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- People v. HillSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. HydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.