Reliance Trading Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement is limited to entry items described as artificial flowers (R. 2), exported from Hong Kong in July 1962. The parties, both in their rule 15 statements and again in their briefs, agree that export value, section 402(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C., section 1401a, is the correct basis for valuing the artificial flowers. Section 402, as amended, defines export value as follows:(b) Expoet Value. — For the purposes of this section, the export value of imported merchandise shall be the price, at the time of ex-*778porfcation to the United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Batten & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. F. C. Gerlach & Co.United States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. Philipp Brothers Chemicals, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1961
- Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Gerlach v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reliance Trading Corp. of Illinois v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Reliance Trading Corporation of Illinois v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971