Legal Opinion

City of Madison v. Clarke

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1980No. 12643PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered by the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court of South Dakota in favor of plaintiff City of Madison (City) upholding a determination by the City’s Board of Adjustment that defendants were not entitled to a zoning variance. We affirm.

Defendants applied for and received a building permit for a house. They did not apply for a permit to build a roofed patio or “carport.” The roof of the carport is three feet, four inches from the south boundary line of the property. The house is in a zoning area with a “side-yard” restriction that requires a space of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment of Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coyote Flats, L.L.C. v. Sanborn County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hamerly v. City of Lennox Bd. of Adj.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cole v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF HURONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gregoire v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Chokecherry Hills Estates, Inc. v. Deuel CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API