Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. Ward
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 25, 1996No. A96A1324PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge.
In this products liability action, we granted the petitions for interlocutory appeals of Motorola, Inc. and Cartunes, Inc. from orders denying their motions for summary judgment. We reverse as to both defendants.
“In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the opposing party should be given the benefit of all reasonable doubt, and the court should construe the evidence and all inferences and conclusions arising therefrom most favorably toward the party opposing the motion.” (Citation omitted; emphasis in original.) Sunamerica Financial v. 260 Peachtree Street, Inc., 202 Ga.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- SunAmerica Financial, Inc. v. 260 Peachtree Street, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Jordan v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- City of Cordele v. Turton's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- McElmurray v. Augusta-Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Grant v. Georgia Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lane v. Ken Thomas of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Bradford Mortgage Co. v. Johnnie Ganem Appraisal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.