Barton v. Department of Transportation
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMadsen, C.J.
¶52 Parties can enter agreements that partially settle some claims without invoking RCW 4.22.060, and that is what occurred here. Since the agreement did not eliminate the Linvogs’ liability for contribution, it was not the type of agreement that falls within RCW 4.22.060.
¶53 Since this agreement is not a covenant not to enforce judgment as that term is used in RCW 4.22.060, it is not necessary in this case to decide whether a document that does fall within this statute is a release that also acts to release the party from joint and several liability under RCW 4.22.070. But if an agreement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Lowy v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Manary v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Coffman v. McFaddenWashington Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.