Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 16Published

Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Case by Wilson I. Rogers against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff, an engineer in defendant’s employ, was badly injured on the morning of July 20, 1907, in a collision of two trains at Salem, Mich. A special passenger train was to leave Ionia on the morning of July 20, 1907. It was known as an excursion train; its destination being the city of Detroit. At 2:26 o’clock in the morning of July 20th an order, known as ‘s Order No. 31,” was issued by the chief train dispatcher in the city of Detroit, and sent to the operator at Plymouth, who transcribed it and delivered it to the plaintiff. Plaintiff, in proceeding westward with his train, was to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moon v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Veit v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Graham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Stever v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API