Legal Opinion

Bellasi v. Shackelford

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1962No. Civ. 10325PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

Respondent, an owner of real property, sued under the statutory declaratory judgment provisions (Code Civ. Proc., § 1060 et seq.) for a determination that escrow instructions simultaneously filed by himself and defendants did not match and that his offer to sell was revoked prior to defendants’ acceptance. Appellants, cross-complaining, contended a binding contract was in effect. The record discloses the following:

Appellants Shackelford, husband and wife, negotiated to buy 84 acres from respondent Bellasi for $6,000. On August 28, 1959, both filed their escrow instructions with the title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roth v. MoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chapman College v. WagenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bullock v. McKeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ersa Grae Corp. v. Fluor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Davies v. LanginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Brown v. LabowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. LaymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API