Bellasi v. Shackelford
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
Respondent, an owner of real property, sued under the statutory declaratory judgment provisions (Code Civ. Proc., § 1060 et seq.) for a determination that escrow instructions simultaneously filed by himself and defendants did not match and that his offer to sell was revoked prior to defendants’ acceptance. Appellants, cross-complaining, contended a binding contract was in effect. The record discloses the following:
Appellants Shackelford, husband and wife, negotiated to buy 84 acres from respondent Bellasi for $6,000. On August 28, 1959, both filed their escrow instructions with the title…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roth v. MoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chapman College v. WagenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bullock v. McKeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ersa Grae Corp. v. Fluor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Davies v. LanginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Brown v. LabowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. LaymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.