Legal Opinion
Juror Number One v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2012No. C067309PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
Following the conviction of real parties in interest for various offenses stemming from an assault, respondent court learned that one of the trial jurors, fictitiously named Juror Number One, had posted one or more items on his Facebook account concerning the trial while it was in progress, in violation of an admonition by the court. The court conducted a hearing at which Juror Number One and several other jurors were examined about this and other claimed instances of misconduct. Following the hearing, the court entered an order requiring Juror Number One to execute a consent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sublet, Harris & Monge-Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- People v. WeathertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Mintz v. Mark Bartelstein & Associates, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Facebook, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Homeaway.com, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.