Legal Opinion
Vallez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided June 28, 2000No. 04-99-00207-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
In each of these appeals, Jessie Vallez appeals the trial court’s second amended nunc pro tunc judgment. In his sole point of error, Vallez contends that the trial court erred in entering the unfavorable nunc pro tunc judgments without affording him a hearing and legal counsel. We sustain Vallez’s point of error and reverse the second amended nunc pro tunc judgments.
Procedural History
Vallez was indicted for three separate offenses. In trial court cause number 90-CR-1302 (appeal number 99-207-CR), Vallez was indicted on February 5, 1990, for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- LaPorte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ex Parte McJunkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Robbins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Dach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
- Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- Brian Kenson Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.