Legal Opinion
Weiland v. Turkelson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 9, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
38 N.J. Super. 239 (1955)
118 A.2d 689
FRANK WEILAND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES P. TURKELSON AND LILLIAN E. TURKELSON, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 31, 1955.
Decided November 9, 1955.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Leon A. Wingate, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Bennett & Wingate, attorneys).
Mr. William G. Bischoff argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Carroll, Taylor & Bischoff, attorneys).
2Per curiam
The briefs on the appeal do not deal with the issues raised by the counterclaim. With…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Bendler v. BendlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Coal Belt Electric Railway Co. v. Peabody Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Jarman v. FreemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
- Jarman v. FreemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Jewish Center of Sussex County v. WhaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Globe Motor Car v. First FidelityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. PlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Windsor Shirt Co. v. New Jersey National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.