Kyser v. T. M. Bragg & Sons
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MiNor W. Mill wee, Associate Justice.
The question presented is whether the amount of $62.00 charged appellants in a conditional sales contract for a power unit purchased from appellees represented finance or interest charges, or merely a portion of a credit purchase price.
On March 24, 1954, the appellants, Lester Kyser and Ernest Kyser, his father, purchased a used “11-40” power unit from appellees, T. M. Bragg and Sons, a partnership and retail machinery dealer at Benton, Arkansas. The parties executed a conditional sales contract on a printed form furnished appellees by Allis-Chalmers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Whiddon v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Montgomery v. Arkansas Cold Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Blount v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CristDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
- Blount v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.