Legal Opinion

Kyser v. T. M. Bragg & Sons

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 27, 1958No. 5-1441PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MiNor W. Mill wee, Associate Justice.

The question presented is whether the amount of $62.00 charged appellants in a conditional sales contract for a power unit purchased from appellees represented finance or interest charges, or merely a portion of a credit purchase price.

On March 24, 1954, the appellants, Lester Kyser and Ernest Kyser, his father, purchased a used “11-40” power unit from appellees, T. M. Bragg and Sons, a partnership and retail machinery dealer at Benton, Arkansas. The parties executed a conditional sales contract on a printed form furnished appellees by Allis-Chalmers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Whiddon v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Montgomery v. Arkansas Cold Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Blount v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CristDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
  5. Blount v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API