Legal Opinion

Reading School District v. Department of Education

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Reading School District (District) appeals from the decision of the Secretary of Education (Secretary) affirming the Pennsylvania Department of Education’s (Department) decision to identify thirteen schools as failing to achieve adequate yearly progress (AYP) under Section 6311(b)(2)(B) of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), 20 U.S.C. § 6311(b)(2)(B). We affirm the Secretary in this matter of first impression before the Court.

NCLB, which was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002, amended the Elementary and Secondary Education…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Carbondale Area School District v. Fell Charter SchoolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Fitz v. Intermediate Unit No. 29Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Board of School Directors of Avon Grove School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Homer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Reading School District v. Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. In Re Formation of Independent School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. In Re Formation of Independent School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API