Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Churchill

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 13, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, C. J.

In this action of trespass, a referee, hearing the case with the right of exceptions on questions of law reserved, as authorized by Rule 42 of the Rules of Court, 129 Me. 519, filed a report awarding the plaintiffs a recovery of $1,900, applicable largely to hardwood and softwood timber which the defendant removed from land of the *10plaintiffs under a claim of title thereto. Something was included, it is true, for damage caused to young growth and to the realty, in the course of the defendant’s operation, but if he was the owner of the growth removed, those items would represent nothing more…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Staples v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  2. Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
  3. Kennebunk, Kennebunkport & Wells Water District v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  4. Pike v. MunroeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
  5. Throumoulos v. First National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bourque-Lanigan Post No. 5 v. CareySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API