State v. Le Flohic
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury, tried in the district court for St. Louis county before Cant, J., and a jury, and convicted of keeping a house of ill-fame. Erom an order denying her motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, 0.
The defendant was indicted at the September, 1913, term of the district court of St. Louis county for keeping a house of ill-fame. When the indictment was called for trial at the January, 1914, term, she moved for a dismissal upon the ground that the indictment against her was not tried at the next term of the court at which it was triable. The motion was denied. The defendant was convicted. She appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.
1. The defendant based her motion for dismissal upon R. L. 1905, § 4786 (G. S. 1913, § 8510), which, so far as here material, is as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ochs v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Gillespie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. EnkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- State v. DehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. ArtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. McGowanMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. LightheartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.