Legal Opinion

Abraham v. City of Roseburg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Douglas: James W. Hamilton, Judge. The plaintiff, Albert Abraham, appeals from a decree of the circuit court dismissing a writ of review brought by him against the City of Roseburg.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBride

The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the circuit court dismissing a writ of review brought by him against *361the defendant. His appeal presents two questions for our consideration. First, has the City of Roseburg power under its charter to exact from a person pursuing the occupation of attorney at law, a license fee of $10? Second, has the city recorder of- Roseburg power under the charter to try persons for violating the city ordinances ?

1. The city charter (Sp. Laws 1905, p. 40.) gives the council power to license, tax, and regulate hawkers, peddlers, pawnbrokers, shows, public amusements,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. State v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Fleetwood v. ReadWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kinsley v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. City of San José v. San José & Santa Clara R.R.California Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Application of GalushaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Portland v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API