Legal Opinion

Appeal of Gelinas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 23, 1997No. 95-618PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The claimant, Gerald Gelinas, appeals from a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) denying him workers’ compensation benefits. We vacate and remand.

The board found the following facts. The claimant began working at Pilgrim Foods, Inc. in 1991 as a tractor trailer driver. His job included delivering liquid freight and dry bulk load freight to area *296warehouses. The liquid freight deliveries required the handling of heavy hoses, and the bulk load deliveries sometimes involved lifting pallets weighing seventy to ninety pounds each. The claimant’s supervisor testified at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Appeal of LalimeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Appeal of BriandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Appeal of Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. In re CroteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Appeal of HCA Parkland Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Appeal of RouthierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Appeal of Anheuser-Busch Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Appeal of BellisleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API