Legal Opinion

Fort Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati Railroad v. Mellett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1884No. 9000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

We think that the complaint in this case, although not skilfully drawn, may be regarded as showing that the appellant entered upon the land described in the pleading-without right or claim of title, and that, therefore, the rule that no valid deed can be made while another is in adverse possession does not apply. The rule that a deed can not be made while there is an adverse possession under claim of title has long obtained in this State, and, until the change effected by the statute of 1881, was the law of the State. Bell v. Longworth, 6 Ind. 273; Doe v. Hearich, 14 Ind. 242.

The complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bell v. LongworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Hills v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. NicklessIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Draper v. ZebecIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bloomfield Railroad v. Van SlikeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McCoy v. HouckIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Egan v. North American Loan Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API