Kreiss v. Seligman
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer to complaint. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSelden, J.
The complaint in this action that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff for goods, wares, merchandises, groceries and lumber, sold and delivered, generally, without any specification of the property sold. The plaintiff, however, has furnished a bill of particulars, containing a large number of charges for beer sold and delivered. The answer *440sets up that the beer for which the plaintiff seeks to recover, was sold by the plaintiff to the defendant with full knowledge that the latter intended to sell the same at retail, without license, and in violation of the excise laws; and relies upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ruckman v. BryanNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Starkweather v. KittleNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Morgan v. GroffNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lewis v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Howell v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. MasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- People ex rel. Thorne v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
- Banchor v. ManselSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.