Legal Opinion

People v. Burroughs

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1984No. Crim. 23151PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

Defendant Burroughs, a 77-year-old self-styled “healer,” appeals from a judgment convicting him of unlawfully selling drugs, compounds, or devices for alleviation or cure of cancer (Health & Saf. Code, § 1707.1); felony practicing medicine without a license (Bus. & Prof. Code, *827§ 2141.5, now § 2053); and second degree felony murder (Pen. Code, § 187) in the treatment and death of Lee Swatsenbarg.

Burroughs challenges his second degree murder conviction by contending the felonious unlicensed practice of medicine is not an “inherently dangerous” felony, as that term has been used…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. SatchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. Frandsen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. BlakeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API