Hartwig v. Kell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Dickinson; Flanigan, J. Case by Bertha Hartwig, an infant, by her next friend, against Milton Kell for a criminal assault. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $2,500, the case is brought here by writ of error.
We quote, for the purpose of showing what the litigation is about, from the opinion of the trial judge when he overruled the motion for a new trial:
“The declaration in separate counts charges Kell with having made an indecent assault on the plaintiff, and with having induced, aided, and abetted a similar assault made by one Arthur Le Boeuf. As far as necessary to recount it in disposing of the questions presented by the motion for a new trial, the story, which the jury were fully…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Kinney v. FolkertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Spray v. AyotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Hewitt v. East Jordan Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Lewis v. Detroit Vitrified Brick Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nagi v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Schneider v. C. H. Little Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Henderson v. BielmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Le Mieux v. Sherriff-Goslin Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Sakorraphos v. Eastman Kodak Stores, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.