Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Detention of Halgren

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 2006No. 76161-2Published

1Dissent

¶36 (dissenting) — The State is prohibited from administering CR 35 mental examinations in the course of involuntary commitment proceedings under chapter 71.09 RCW. In re Det. of Williams, 147 Wn.2d 476, 491, 55 P.3d 597 (2002). However the centerpiece of the State’s case against Michael Halgren was the results of a CR 35 mental examination administered over his objections by the *813State’s expert witness, Dr. Robert Wheeler, while Halgren remained in custody. The majority declines to consider Halgren’s CR 35 claim and, instead, adopts a theory advanced by the State for the first time before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API