Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1938No. 4 Div. 33Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

GARDNER, Justice.

For the first time on application for rehearing, appellees suggest in brief the reformation should be confined to the mortgage, and should not embrace the foreclosure deed, — the effect of which would be to restore the equity of redemption.

We have examined the cited cases (Provost v. Rebman, 21 Iowa 419; McKissick v. Mill Owners’ Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 50 Iowa 116; Carrigg v. Mechanics’ Bank, 136 Iowa 261, 111 N.W. 329; Marks v. Taylor, 23 Utah 470, 65 P. 203; Fisher v. Villamil, 62 Fla. 472, 56 So. 559, 39 L.R.A.,N.S., 90, Ann.Cas.1913D, 1003; Blodgett v. Hobart,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goulding Fertilizer Co. v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Spotswood v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Fisher v. VillamilSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Carrigg v. Mechanics Bank of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Blodgett v. HobartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API