Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 18, 1867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

CASE 36 — PETITION ORDINARY — ATTACHMENT— APPEAL PROM M’LEAN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 257 ; 2 Mel., 209, 445.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE WILLIAMS

delivered the opinion oe the court:

Appellee sued out an attachment on a debt secured by mortgage against II. Hawkins. The latter, with appel-, lant, executed a bond under section 242, Civil Code, undertaking to perform the judgment, and not to produce the property to answer it, as authorized by section 235; which bond really discharged the attachment and rendered all inquiry into the liability of the property attached or its value, needless.

Appellant, however, preferred a prior lien on the property, and the court investigated the matter and adjudged in his favor as to it, but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwein v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hudson Engineering Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Brown v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Daugherty v. Bell National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Leet & Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API