Legal Opinion
Pete King v. United Benefit Fire Insurance Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1967No. 8732_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
The principal problem involved in this diversity case is whether there was prejudicial error in the refusal of the lower court to grant trial by jury or whether the issues relating to the execution of a contract between the parties and any indemnity due thereunder were purely matters of law or of uncontroverted facts allowing summary disposition.
The appellant, Pete King, is a citizen of the State of Oklahoma. The appellee, United Benefit Fire Insurance Company, is a corporation licensed in the State of Nebraska to become surety on bail bonds in civil and criminal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Morgantown v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Amf Tuboscope, Inc., and American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re N-500L CasesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. CORRY JAMESTOWN CORP.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Bowdry v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Agudas Chasidei Chabad of United States v. Barry Gourary, Hanna Gourary, Intervenor-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.