Legal Opinion

Kanatas v. Home Life Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1936No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

Appellant complains that a verdict was directed for the defendant in her suit on a policy of insurance on the life of her husband, effective April 12, 1929. Five times between February 12, 1933, and March 12, 1934, the insured permitted the policy to lapse for non-payment of premium, and five times it was reinstated. The learned president judge of the court below held that the re-in-statement was obtained by misrepresentation of facts essential to reinstatement. The insured died of sarcoma of the lungs September 30, 1934.

Appellant’s first proposition is in these…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Board of Assessors of the Parish v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brandwene Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Baxter v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Indovina v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Culver v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Glaser v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Schwartz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API