Legal Opinion

United States v. Choy Kum

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 15, 1950No. 32647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

The Indictment here, returned June 28, 1950, contains 19 Counts. Count 1 charges a conspiracy to defraud the United States and sets forth overt acts which also form the basis of the substantive charges in the remaining counts. 18 U.S.C.A. § 88, now 18 U.S.C.A. § 371. Counts 2, 5, 8, 11, 14 and 17 allege violations of the law as to passports, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1542, formerly 22 U.S.C.A. § 220. (As to these Counts, it may be noted, the reference in the caption of each of these Counts was given as 8 U.S.C.A. § 746(a) (18), now 18 U.S.C.A. § 911, but as the reference forms…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. GottfriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Marzani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Marzani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. BridgesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. United States v. ShowalterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  3. United States v. Gas & Oil Development Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API