Malone v. Malone
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Because the judgment appealed from must be reversed in part and the cause remanded for a redetermination of the attorneys’ fees, a full recital of the context within which this fee issue arose is unnecessary. Suffice it to state only a few background facts.
Pearline Huffman Malone, the purported widow of Moses Malone and the mother of his two minor children, retained C. Knox McLaney III and J. Doyle Fuller, lawyers, to represent her and her minor children as the alleged lawful widow and children of Moses Malone, deceased. She agreed to pay these lawyers a contingency fee of *933one-third of any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Smoot v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- English v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Madison County Department of Human Resources v. T.S. Ex Rel. F.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Madison County Department of Human Resources v. T.S. Ex Rel. F.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- McMurtrey v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990