Legal Opinion

Claxton v. Claxton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Jennison, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtCoolet, C. J.

This is a bill in equity, filed on behalf of a minor, by his general guardian, for partition of lands. The lands are so situated that partition cannot be effected except through a sale, and this is opposed by the other joint owners. A net revenue of about nine per centum upon the value is now realized from the lands. The infant is owner of an undivided one-sixth.

The case has been heard on a stipulation as to the facts, and decree has been made as prayed. Evidently the court has assumed that partition was matter of right, which may be true enough if the facts are such as to warrant it. But…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Queatham v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Hutchinson v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Greene v. MabeySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
  5. Bearinger v. PeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API