United States v. Reeves
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this action by the United States to foreclose a defaulted real estate contract, Will Key Jefferson, a lay person, filed a motion asking that Hitchinrail Duplex Apartments (Hitchinrail), a partnership, be substituted for Narcie B. Reeves and Greater Anchorage Area Borough (Borough), two of the named defendants. In his motion Jefferson alleged that he is a partner in Hitchinrail, and that the partnership acquired the interest of Mrs. Reeves and Borough by quit claim deeds executed after commencement of the action.
The motion for substitution was unopposed and was granted by the district…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John Cocivera, United States of America v. U.S. Health Products, Inc., United States of America v. North American Health Industries, Inc., United States of America v. American Health Products, Inc., United States of America v. Beneficial Health Products, Inc., United States of America v. Universal Medical Company, Inc., United States of America v. Mid-Atlantic Health Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Move Organization v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.