Legal Opinion
D & H Electric Company, a Corporation v. M. Stephens Mfg., Inc., a Corporation and Jack McLoughlin Doing Business as McLoughlin Sales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1956No. 14399PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
An action alleging patent infringement was brought in the District Court by the D & H Electric Company against M. Stephens Mfg., Inc. and Jack MeLoughlin, d/b/a McLotighlin Sales. From a judgment holding no infringement, plaintiff appeals. No appeal is taken by defendants from that portion of the judgment which held plaintiff’s patent valid.
The patent in suit is for a coupling device used in connecting spiraled flexible conduits (which carry electric wires) to junction boxes. Appellant, as assignee of the patent, has, since 1946, made and sold over four million of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Leggett v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Marvin Edwin Whiteman v. L. G. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Smith v. Mid-Continent Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Moon v. Cabot Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Norton Company, Appellant-Cross v. Carborundum Company, Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Input Graphics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Oregon Saw Chain Corporation, a Corporation v. McCulloch Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.