Legal Opinion
Ruland v. Bohner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 5, 1931No. 18853PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The petition set up the following contract:
“Exhibit A.
“Contract for Deed.
“This agreement made and entered into this the 29fch day of August, 1925, by and between Wreatha J. Ruland, party of the first part, and India T. Bohner, party of the second part.
“Whereas said' party of the first part has this day agreed to and with said party of the second part to sell and convey by good and sufficient warranty deed the following real estate, to wit:
“All of lot sixteen (16), block fifty-two (52) Original Town of Lawton, Okla. For the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Pevehouse v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Marshall v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Baker v. Bishop Hill ColonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Alfrey v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- McCubbins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Janeway v. VandeventerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.