Grynberg Production Corp. v. British Gas, P.L.C.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING GRYNBERG PRODUCTION CORPORATION’S MOTION TO REMAND
SCHELL, District Judge.
CAME ON TO BE CONSIDERED plaintiff Grynberg Production Corporation’s (“Grynberg”) Motion to Remand, and the-court, after reviewing the Motion, the responses in opposition and the pleadings of record, is of the opinion that this Motion should be DENIED.
The case underlying this removal battle is an involved and complicated dispute between Western corporations over rights to develop mineral resources located in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The weapons in this removal fight are the…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ticer v. ImperiumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Hyatt Corp. v. StantonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- In Re Tobacco/Governmental Health Care Costs LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Hinojosa v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.