Legal Opinion

Kamen v. Kamen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that plaintiff and defendant Kamen are husband and wife, and that the said defendant and the eodefendant, with whom he is living, are not husband and wife and adjudging null and void a Mexican decree of divorce obtained by the defendant Kamen against the plaintiff subsequent to a final judgment of separation, plaintiff appeals from three orders as follows: Appeal A is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion pursuant to section 1169-a of the Civil Practice Act for counsel fees and expenses in connection with the action, in which both defendants have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Long v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ernst v. ErnstNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Aiello v. BaldasareAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In re the Arbitration between Smith & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API