Burnett v. State

1. The motions to dismiss the bills of exceptions are denied.

2. Under the particular facts of these cases the court did not err in dismissing the motions for a new trial. See Patterson v. State, 28 Ga. *262App. 668; Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645; Reed v. Warnock, 146 Ga. 483. Judgment affirmed.

Decided May 15, 1923. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodicorth, J., coneut. ■J. T. Sislc, for plaintiff in error. A. S. Shelton, solicitor-general, George 0. Grogan, contra.