Hileman v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellant was found guilty of possessing marihuana with intent to deliver and was sentenced to a term of five years, two of which were suspended. We need discuss only two of his points for reversal, as the third is not likely to arise upon a retrial.
There is no merit in the appellant’s argument that he was arrested without probable cause and that therefore the marihuana found by the officers in their ensuing search of his vehicle was inadmissible. Officer McCasland testified that he stopped Hileman’s automobile at about the break of dawn, because Hileman’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mitchell v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
3Cited by9 opinions
- Earl v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- State v. PollockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Bucy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.