Legal Opinion

Guernsey, Bartram & Hendrix v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Officers. Evidence. Attachment. Equity. Practice in the Superior Court. Mechanic’s Lien. Before Judge Hill. Bibb Superior Court. April Adjourned Term, 1816. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Warner, Chief Justice.

It appears from the record and bill of exceptions in this case, that Mrs. Reeves, on the 2nd of November, 1811, employed Parmenter & Seay, as contractors, to build her a house upon her own lot in the city of Macon, according to the terms stipulated in a written contract executed by the parties; that Mrs. Reeves paid the contractors, Parmenter & Seay, for building the house all that she owed them according to her contract with them. It also appears that Guernsey, Bartram & Hendrix were lumber dealers and mechanics, running a planing mill, etc., and as such mechanics, furn*291i…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Tillman v. FontaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Lane v. BradfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API