Lane v. Bradfield
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentBell, J.
I can not concur in the conclusion reached in the first division, nor in the judgment of reversal. An undivided interest in a vested remainder in realty is subject to levy under a common-law execution, and since the code provides that an attachment against a debtor may be levied upon any property of the defendant, real or personal, to be found in the State, such remainder interest in realty is also subject to attachment. Civil Code (1910), §§ 5060, 5061, 5075, 5078. The real crux of the case under consideration is whether a vested remainder in realty is capable of such a seizure as to affect…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tuells v. TorrasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Tillman v. FontaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- McCrory v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- United Provisions Corp. v. Board of MissionsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.