Gudger v. . Robinson Brothers Contractors, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.
C. S., 907, makes provision for the examination of a party to an action on behalf of his coplaintiff or codefendant “as to any matter in which he is not jointly interested or liable with such co-plaintiff or codefendant and as to which a separate and not joint verdict or judgment can be rendered.” The language of the statute does not include a party jointly interested or liable and against whom a joint verdict or judgment can be rendered. It excludes those who have any community of interest and for or against whom there may be a joint verdict and judgment. That the trial might also result in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Butner v. . WhitlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Hicks v. . NivensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Bell v. Murchison National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Evans v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooke v. Kilgore Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Flanner v. Saint Joseph Home for the Blind SistersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Kohler v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Oehler v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Gidius v. LinksConnecticut Superior Court · 1973