Legal Opinion

Law v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 24, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There is no contention by appellant that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury finding him guilty of rape in the first degree. The evidence convinces us that there is no reasonable basis for such a contention. The alleged victim testified positively that between about 3:00 A.M. and 4:00 A.M. on February 21, 1981, after she and appellant and others had been together at some parties, appellant drove her in an automobile to an isolated area and caused her to submit to sexual intercourse with him by wrapping a belt around her neck, choking her and threatening to kill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Welsh v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Lackey v. LackeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Prince v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vinzant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Parish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Smitherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API