Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Parkland Estates

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 14, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

— Plaintiff in error relies upon Sections 4 and 5 of Chapter 14677, Acts of 1931, to reverse a judgment rendered against him in favor of Parkland Estates, a. Florida corporation, that, at the time of instituting its suit and procuring its judgment, was in default in compliance with the 1931 statutes which provide, in affirmative terms, that corporations failing for six months to comply with the provisions of that Act as to the payment of the fees and the making of the reports that such law requires, shall not be permitted to maintain any action in any court of this State until such reports…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Jarvis v. Chapman Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Levine v. LevineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Cor-Gal Builders, Inc. v. SouthardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. American Land Development Corporation v. HillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Irwin v. Gilson Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. 1825 Collins Ave. Corp. v. RudnickSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API