Legal Opinion
Hays v. Cummins (In Re Cummins)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided March 15, 1994No. Bankruptcy No. 91-16453 S. Adv. No. 92-6508PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause came before the Court upon the trial of the complaint to determine discharge-ability and objection to discharge, a core proceeding. The non-core causes of action set forth in the amended counterclaim were also tried to the Court. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), 1334. Moreover, this Court concludes that the causes alleged in the complaint are “core proceedings” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) as exemplified by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), (J). However,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re Jesse H. Long, Debtor. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jesse H. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Mervyn M. MERTZ, Appellee, v. JoAnn ROTT, Julie Rott Kessel, National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- GMAC Inc. v. Coley (In Re Coley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Cambridge Tempositions, Inc. v. Cassis (In Re Cassis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Smith v. Jordan (In Re Jordan)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Ferraro v. Phillips (In Re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Missouri Ex Rel. Nixon v. Allen (In Re Foster)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.