Legal Opinion

Preciado v. Recon Security Corp.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 13, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00052Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION JOSE PRECIADO, § Plaintiff, § § v. § EP-23-CV-00052-RFC § RECON SECURITY CORP., § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Preciado’s “Motion for Sanctions, Entry of Default, and Default Judgment” (“Default Judgment Motion”) (ECF No. 78) and “Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs” (“Attorney Fee Motion”) (ECF No. 79). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Default Judgment Motion. The Court GRANTS the Attorney Fee Motion in part and DENIES it in part. I.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API