Ridgeley v. Crandall
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince Georges county, This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellees, James H. Crandall, and Elizabeth his wife, against the appellant. The declaration contains four counts. 1st, for articles properly chargeable in account, as per particular account thereof filed. 2nd, for goods sold and delivered. 3rd, the usual money counts. 4th, an insimul computassent count.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince Georges county, This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellees, James H. Crandall, and Elizabeth his wife, against the appellant. The declaration contains four counts. 1st, for articles properly chargeable in account, as per particular account thereof filed. 2nd, for goods sold and delivered. 3rd, the usual money counts. 4th, an insimul computassent count. The plaintiffs also filed with the declaration, the following account stating their cause of action, “Charles Ridgeley, Jr. To James H. Crandall and Elizabeth, his wife, Dr. 1850. To this…
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The appellees instituted this action to recover the difference in value alleged to be due the plaintiffs, in the division of the real estate of Jeremiah Mullikin, the father of plaintiff’s wife, between the portion of the said realty allotted to the plaintiff’s wife, and the portion thereof allotted to the appellee’s wife, by commissioners appointed by them and a certain Jeremiah Mullikin, who was entitled to an equal share with his said *440two sisters, in said real estate, under the will of their said father. The declaration contains the usual money counts, and the plaintiffs also filed with it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Higdon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827
- Bayne v. SuitCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851
- Peltier v. SewallNew York Supreme Court · 1834
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kemp v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
- In Re Nicole B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Walsh v. JenveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Soper v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.