Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1923No. 13885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, C. J.

1. Where material physical evidence was introduced upon the trial, an instruction by the court to the jury, that “ the evidence from which you must determine the facts must be presented from the lips of the witnesses who have been sworn and who have testified in the case,” was error. It practically withdrew from the jury the consideration of the physical evidence introduced, was not cured in any other part of the charge, and, under the particular facts of the case, was prejudicial to the accused and requires another trial. See, in this connection, Bouden v. Achor, 95 Ga. 243 (11), 262 (11)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Bowden v. AchorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Blandon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Hilton v. Sylvania & Girard RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. English v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API