Budish v. Daniel
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
At issue is the rate of postjudgment interest applicable in a State court proceeding to enforce a Federal court judgment. On March 1, 1993, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio entered a judgment in a copyright infringement action for the plaintiff in the amount of $570,548 “plus statutory interest from the date of this judgment forward as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 [1988 ed. & Supp. IV 1992].” 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the Federal court set the rate of postjudgment interest at 3.45%. Thereafter, the plaintiff, Armond Budish, commenced an action in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Forest Sales Corporation v. Walter Bedingfield, Rufus McLartyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Donahue v. Dal, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Clark v. ChildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Atwood v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jancey v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Smith v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Doe v. Superintendent of Schools of StoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Lockley v. CSX Transportation Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mike Smith Pontiac, GMC, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.