Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Cardoza
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1987No. A031136PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Appellant William R. Bradford filed a complaint for declaratory relief against respondents Albert M. Cardoza, the Solano County Sheriff, and California Attorney General John Van de Kamp. Bradford sought a declaration that he is no longer subject to possible criminal liability pursuant to Penal Code section 12021, a statute prohibiting the possession of concealable firearms by convicted felons.
The respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted by the trial court on the basis that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to state a cause of action.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James Rolf Bjerkan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Clifford Ray SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Linton v. BecerraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992