Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Falls Education Ass'n v. Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of Education

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1996No. 15833PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edward J. Mahoney, Judge.

This cause of action is before this court pursuant to remand by the Supreme Court of Ohio. 71 Ohio St.3d 171, 642 N.E.2d 1085. The Supreme Court has determined that relators, Cuyahoga Falls Education Association and Stanley Sipka, are entitled to the extraordinary remedy of a writ of mandamus against respondent, Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of Education, based on respondent’s wrongful termination of relator Sipka. This court must now determine the remaining issue, namely, the extent of damages due to the relators.

I

Stanley Sipka taught industrial arts and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Hamlin v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Redman v. Department of EducationAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Little York Tavern v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Crumbley v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API